校園一隅

三鶯研究

首頁 > 學生表現 > 三鶯研究>歷屆碩專班論文

性騷擾罪實證分析:以修法前後判決為中心
(碩專班:洪子婷)(指導教授:楊文山)

刊登日期:2025-09-09  
友善列印
  • 研究生:洪子婷
  • 論文名稱:性騷擾罪實證分析:以修法前後判決為中心
  • 指導教授:楊文山
  • 關鍵字:性騷擾罪、性騷擾防治法第25條刑事判決、量刑分析

  • 論文中文摘要
2023年MeToo運動引發社會各界對性騷擾防治制度不足的反思,促使立法機關迅速回應改革訴求,於同年 8 月修正公布性騷擾防治法第 25 條,刪除原得單科罰金之規定,增訂利用權勢或機會實施性騷擾者加重其刑。本研究旨在探討修法前後司法實務對於性騷擾罪案件量刑趨勢之差異,透過蒐集2023年至2024年臺灣臺北地方法院刑事判決,綜整犯罪情狀、被害人特性、行為人背景與犯後態度等概況,並以單因子變異數分析及多元迴歸分析檢驗法律修正與各項因素對量刑結果之影響。
研究結果發現,被害人年齡與行為人犯後態度對刑期長度具穩定預測力,法院對於未成年者被害案件普遍判處較高刑期,行為人坦承犯行則有助於減輕刑度,此外,兩造是否和解在單因子變異數分析中與刑期呈顯著負向關係,在多元迴歸模型雖未達顯著水準,但對量刑判斷可能仍具潛在影響效果。整體而言,法律修正對量刑尚無顯著影響,未來隨施行時間延長與樣本數累積,其效應變化仍有待持續觀察與驗證。
相較於既有研究多聚焦於行政法院對性騷擾之認定或法律適用爭議,本文運用實證方法探究法律變遷對刑事裁判的影響,期能填補性騷擾罪量刑決策與修法效應研究之缺口,為性騷擾防治政策與司法實務應用提供參考,奠定後續相關研究基礎。

  • 論文英文摘要
In 2023, Taiwan amended Article 25 of the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act in response to the MeToo movement, abolishing fines as the sole penalty and imposing harsher sanctions for harassment committed through abuse of power or opportunism. This study investigates whether the amendment has affected sentencing outcomes in criminal courts.
Criminal judgments from the Taipei District Court between 2023 and 2024 were collected. Case circumstances, victim and offender characteristics, and offender attitudes were coded and analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA and multiple regression to determine factors influencing sentencing length.
Findings indicate that victim age and offender attitudes are stable predictors of sentencing: cases involving minors result in harsher penalties, while confessions may reduce sentence length. Although settlements correlated with lighter sentences in univariate analysis, the effect diminished in multivariate models. The amendment has not yet produced a significant sentencing impact, warranting continued observation as more cases accumulate.
In contrast to prior research that primarily focuses on administrative rulings or statutory interpretation, this study provides empirical evidence on criminal sentencing for sexual harassment, offering insights for judicial practice and policy development while laying a foundation for future research on the effects of legal reforms.