本研究指出檢舉作為公民參與交通治理的一種型式，有意無意的建構出警民間合作與緊張的互動關係。本文以既有文獻資料分析和質性訪談的方式探討民眾檢舉交通違規事件之意涵，官民共同構成的全景監視雖對違規行為和違規者有其嚇阻及規訓的效能，其效果可能是片面的但亦是多元延展且具反轉性的：一、單純以檢舉及成案的數量來觀察，民眾檢舉交通違規事件集中於違規臨時停車。二、民力的加入並未減輕、甚至可能加重了警政的負擔，公共執法量能的快速增加常超出既有勤務的負荷進而可能擾亂整體警務資源的配置。三、民眾檢舉的制度化的另一成效是培養出能與警務人員匹配/匹敵、兼具監視與法律專業素養的檢舉職人；職人以其專業素養所提出的檢舉雖有利於行政程序的完整與完成，但也代表官民關係的可能翻轉，職人不但可更有效的監視民眾也可更有效的監視官僚。四、最後，交通治理不是單一警政機關的工作，單純警民合作的契機除了要基於警民的相互尊重，更要善用既有的制度分工機制與科技工具，將無限的民力適度的分散於交通治理的各個層面。  

論文外文摘要： 

The current study shows how s simple act of encouraging public to report traffic violations to the police as way of improving traffic disorder has its intended and unintended consequences. Using existing public documentation and intensive interview with informants, this thesis shows that while a total surveillance system that composed of both police and public watching together has its intended effect of “punish and discipline”, it has also: 1) observed solely by the number of reports and cases, the public reports of traffic violations are concentrated on illegal temporary parking; 2) heavily increased the workload of the exiting police force to the degree of interfering with other operations; 3) created a group of skilled and committed “whistleblowers” who are not only very capable of correctively reporting traffic violations to the police but also quite capable of “supervising” and/or “challenging” the police procedures which may both enhance and intrude the existing operation routines and power relationship between government and the people; 4) Finally, this article emphasizes that traffic governance is not the work of a single police agency. The opportunity for pure police-civilian cooperation is not only based on mutual respect between police and civilians, but also on the use of existing institutional division of labor and technological tools to appropriately disperse unlimited civilian power at all levels of traffic governance.