政治社會學的討論中，企業的政治獻金分析是探討企業政治權力與政治權力交錯的一個重要取徑，目前台灣的研究僅停留在甚麼企業會參與，以及捐贈後對企業有甚麼影響，尚未有受捐贈後，對政治菁英有甚麼影響的文獻。本文以階級支配理論的觀點，觀察2012年台灣前五百大企業的政治獻金狀況，整合2012年第八屆立法委員政治獻金帳戶，並用內容分析檢驗第七屆立法委員提案是否會影響選舉期間政治獻金的收入，以及政治獻金收入是否會影響第八屆立法委員的提案，以檢驗階級支配在台灣的適用性。統計分析結果顯示，提案不影響政治獻金收入與否，但是會影響收入量的多寡。而有五百大企業政治獻金收入的立委於第八屆立法院提案中，有顯著多餘其他立委在企業勞工相關的立法提案。這些發現顯示，政治權力分裂過後，企業權力已經逐漸侵蝕了國家機器。

Political sociologists have long been analyzing campaign contribution data of businesses to evaluate the extent to which corporate power intervenes in political processes. There have been some studies dedicated in answering the critical questions inside the Legislative Yuan. However, none of those studies take initiatives participation and campaign contribution effect into account. In this paper, the campaign contribution data of corporates in the 2012 legislator election is collected and examined with 7th and 8th legislators. Empirical evidence shows that legislators initiative more legislation about corporate’s benefit are more likely to receive more campaign contribution. Moreover, each of legislators who received campaign contribution from the top 500 corporate are more likely to initiative more legislation about corporate’s benefit. These results indicate that corporate’s domination is more powerful in contemporary Taiwan.