校園一隅

三鶯研究

首頁 > 學生表現 > 三鶯研究>歷屆碩士班論文

八巷的故事:反服貿佔領運動行動者中配角的網路與動員
(碩士班:陳映攸)(指導教授:張恒豪)

刊登日期:2015-07-20  
友善列印
  • 研究生:陳映攸
  • 論文名稱:八巷的故事:反服貿佔領運動行動者中配角的網路與動員
  • 指導教授:張恒豪
  • 關鍵詞:專業的業餘者、網際網路、動員、社會網絡
  • 社會運動的研究理論和討論,多半著重在社會運動當中的核心社會運動組織領導人,以及資源的串聯與連結等相關結構性因素部分,較少關注抗爭現場的「配角」與素人的動員與組織。以此次318反服貿佔領運動為例,除了核心的決策小組以及議場外的幾個社會運動組織之外,還有一群沒有組織性的自主公民,透過自己的方式,在抗爭現場中發起動員、組織。這一群自主公民在過往的社會運動中也曾經出現,並且為了運動付出,卻往往成為被遺忘的配角。
    本研究以318反服貿佔領運動現場中,固守林森南路8巷是抗爭現場配角研究對象。這群抗爭現場的配角,包括透過PTT和FB等網路平台發起動員而來的參與者,路過的漂流學生這兩種學運素人組成的自發性組織,透過當時現場參與觀察,後續深入訪談,與社會網絡分析。本研究試圖了解在抗爭過程中,這群「運動配角」如何進行動員,動員的網路與社會脈絡為何?以及不同社會網路與組織的參與者又如何在抗爭現場進行組織、合作與分工?網路的論壇與抗爭現場的互動如何影響實際的抗爭現場組織與認同?
    本研究發現,以網際網路為大眾主要互動平台的公民社會中,網路已經成為社會運動行動者的新動員方式,公民在網路延伸戰場和實際抗爭現場參與社會運動。專業的業餘者在社會運動中,帶來不同領域和經驗的專業支持,更協助社會運動核心組織串連起其他來自網路動員的行動者。然而,透過網路為主要動員的方式,對於抗爭現場組織運作有一定阻礙,尤其是無法確認資訊正確時、人力協調,以及物資調配時,就容易引發衝突。另外,隨著運動的進行,行動者會同時建立起抗爭現場的社會網絡,以及網際網路上的虛擬網絡,這兩個社會網絡之間並非單獨進行,而是會在運動過程不斷產生互動,互相影響。
  • This research examines the supporting characters of social movement protest in the March 18th anti-Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement (anti-CSSTA)Occupation Movement. This spontaneous protest group of supporting characters firmly held the site of Lane 8, Linsen S. Road outside Legislative Yuan during the occupation movement. Most participants were mobilized through internet, like PTT and FB network platforms. Through participation and observation at the scene, as well as subsequent in-depth interviews and social network analysis, this research explores the protest process, and shows how this group of "Professional amateurs" was mobilized and organized in the process of on-going occupation movement. How did the participants from different social networks and organizations group, cooperate, and collaborate? How did the interaction between the Internet forums and site protests affect the grouping and cognition at the scene?
    This research shows that in a civil society where Internet is the public's main interaction platform, the networks have become a new resource of mobilization by social movement actors, and citizens participate in the social movement by extending the battle field and protest site via the internet. Professional amateur plays an important role in organize the activists mobilized by internet.
    However, sharing of the massive information via the internet actually brought some obstacles to the organization at the protest site. When information could not be confirmed, it was easy to cause conflicts among the participants. The solution of disputes mostly resorted to aftermath conciliation based on what had actually happened at the scene. Finally, the on-site social network of the movement interacts with internet connections.