校園一隅

三鶯研究

首頁 > 學生表現 > 三鶯研究>歷屆碩專班論文

公務機構內臨時人員、派遣與承攬員工三方的比較─以某公立就業服務站為例
(碩專班:羅小冬) (指導教授:張清富)

刊登日期:2013-01-03  
友善列印
  • 研究生:羅小冬
  • 論文名稱: 公務機構內臨時人員、派遣與承攬員工三方的比較─以某公立就業服務站為例
  • 指導教授: 張清富
  • 關鍵字:   派遣、承攬、就業服務站、順從
  • 為避免企業大量使用派遣員工,勞委會在2010年7月提出26年來最大變革的『勞動基準法』修正案,首次將派遣勞工納入規範,除限七類工作不得雇用派遣工,一般企業派遣工人數不能超過總員額3%,經勞資會議或工會同意可放寬至5%和20%。在這一波改革下,勞委會所屬機關原大量使用派遣人力,現為避免觸法,許多業務都改以承攬方式進用。

    本論文採質性研究的深度訪談,瞭解為何人們願意從事派遣或承攬的工作、日後再從事派遣或承攬的意願以及轉為機關所屬臨時人員意願為何。

    本文係以Burawoy的研究為基礎,運用其理論探討何以派遣或承攬勞工會順服在此體制之下。研究結果發現,一方面勞委會(內部勞動市場)透過訂定『行政院運用勞動派遣應行注意事項』(年資獎賞)培育出對公司的奉獻精神,在生產剩餘價值的過程中,具體地調和了資本家與勞工的利益。另一方面有可能因為在經濟壓力下,讓派遣員工非自願的接受不平等的勞動環境,犧牲相關權益以取得工作,而順服在既有的體制下。

    但值得注意的是,政府棄派遣而大量使用承攬,除了派遣勞工數據失真之外,承攬勞工日後是否像派遣勞工一樣,遭遇如同派遣一樣用過即丟的命運。


  • Abstract

    To avoid using a large number of dispatched employees in business, the Council of Labor Affairs Executive Yuan brought up the most important change of “Labor Standard Law” amendment in recent twenty-six years in June 2010. This is the first time that makes dispatched labor into the standard norms. In addition, seven categories of works are not allowed to employ dispatched labors and the number of dispatched labors can’t surpass 3% of its total employees in general corporate. It can be relaxed to 5% and up to 20% respectively through labor-management conference and agreement of the union. In order to avoid breaking the “Labor Standard Law” amendment, many jobs in Council of Labor Affairs are shifted from dispatched labors to contract-projected labors in this reform.

    Employed the depth interview of qualitative research, this research attempts to understand why people would engage in dispatched or contract-projected jobs, whether or not they would do these jobs again in the future, and how they would shift to temporary staffs or not.

    Based on Burawoy’s research, the research uses his theory to discuss how dispatched or contracted-projected labors obey this system. The paper shows that, on the one hand, the Council of Labor Affairs fostered the dedicated spirit through setting “Attention of Labor-dispatched by Executive Yuan” to specifically reconcile the profits of both labors and capitalists during the process of producing surplus value. On the other hand, it also probably let dispatched labors reluctantly accepted the unequal labor environment, sacrificed their relative rights in order to obtain the jobs and submit to this system under the economic pressure.

    However, it is worth to notice that government uses a large number of contract-projected rather than dispatched workers. Besides the data of dispatched labors are lack precisely, whether or not contract-projected labors are the same as dispatched labors, their disserted fates after they are used were just like the dispatched labors.