校園一隅

三鶯研究

首頁 > 學生表現 > 三鶯研究>歷屆碩專班論文

建構社會生活安全指標體系之研究
(碩專班:蔡憲卿) (指導教授:蔡明璋)

刊登日期:2004-08-31  
友善列印
  • 研究生: 蔡憲卿
  • 論文名稱: 建構社會生活安全指標體系之研究
  • 論文名稱: The Study on Construction of Indicator System for Social Life Security
  • 指導教授: 蔡明璋教授
  • 關鍵字: 社會生活安全  指標體系
  • [摘要]

    論文提要內容: 本文嘗試結合社會學、犯罪學、統計學及社會指標理論,研擬建構「社

    會生活安全指標體系」,使國民個人對生活安全情境有所覺知,也提供政府部門作為規劃

    施政策略及精進社會安全政策,提昇行政信任度及施政滿意度之參據,達到應用社會學實

    證研究與發展之功能。本文針對行政院主計處八十三年編製沿用至今之「國民生活指標體

    系架構」中之安全領域統計指標項目認有不足,依據學者研究文獻、行政院治安會報「三

    安政策」及生活安全之概念內涵,建構我國「社會生活安全指標體系」,以具體及有效地

    衡量測度生活安全情境。本指標體系計分「社會治安」、「交通安全」、「公共安全」三

    個構面次領域:「治安構面」選取1.犯罪發生(率)、2.犯罪破獲(率)、3.犯罪受害(

    人口率)、4.偵防警力(比例)、5.警政支出(比例)五個指標;「交安構面」選取1.交

    通事故(發生率)、2.車輛肇事(率)、3.車禍受害(人口率)、4.交通違規(率)、5.

    車享路積五個指標;「公安構面」選取1.意外災害(發生率)、2.災害受害(人口率)

    、3.公安檢查(合格率)、4.消防人力(比例)、5.消防設施(率)五個指標;共計十五

    個指標群。資料蒐集包括行政院主計處之《社會指標統計》年報、內政部警政署之《警政

    統計年報》、內政部消防署之《消防統計年報》、台灣各縣市政府《統計要覽》預決算表

    等,為求較高之信度與效度,統計時間以2000、2001、2002年三年度資料數值之平均值作

    為各指標之運算數值。本文分別以毛瑞斯(Morris)標準化指數轉換法及T-Score標準化指

    數轉換法加以試編各指標之單元指數及安全體系之綜合指數,採用SPSS10.0電腦統計軟體

    操作測量,並將各縣市生活安全程度予以排序,以這兩種轉換法實證測量結果發現相對名

    次排序相當一致,顯見本體系所選取之各指標能有效具體測度各地區之生活安全度。本研

    究復將所建構之指標體系客觀指數與聯合報民調中心「2001年縣市長施政滿意度及治安滿

    意度」主觀指數相互檢驗,以皮爾森(Pearson)係數相關分析結果:生活安全綜合指數與

    施政滿意度達中級程度相關,治安構面指數及生活安全綜合指數與治安滿意度達高度相關

    ,P值亦達非常顯著關係,顯見本研究建構之「社會生活安全指標體系」能顯著地衡量各縣

    市之治安狀況及生活安全程度,具高度之信度及效度。本研究再與相關社經因素進行假設

    檢驗,以複迴歸分析模型實證分析結果發現:「人口密度」與治安滿意度及生活安全綜合

    指數均具有顯著負向相關,「每戶消費支出」、「儲蓄金額」、「支配所得」、「失業率

    」則並不具顯著關係。本研究獲致結論一:人口密集度與生活安全度具有顯著的負向相關

    ;結論二:都市化及工業化程度也是影響生活安全度重要的因素;結論三:都市化造成社

    會結構分化,削弱社會聯繫鍵(Social Bond)及社區意識凝聚力,減弱社會規範力;強化

    社會聯繫力亦能增加社會生活安全程度。最後,本文根據研究發現與結論,對政府有關部

    門及公共政策提出建議,以供規劃社會安全政策之參考。

  • [摘要]

    Abstract

    This article is in attempt to research and research to establish the life

    safety indicator socially by integrating sociology, criminology, statistics

    and the theory of social indicator so that the civilians shall be sensible of

    the safe settings of daily life, applicable for the governmental agencies to

    project the administrative policies and the security principles for further

    refinement.

    We find the deficiency of the statistic indicator items within the safe

    realm listed in the “the systemic structure of civilian life indicator”

    proposed by the Auditing Department of Executive Yuan in 1994. From the

    research lectures of scholars, the public security report of Executive Yuan

    and the ideology contents of safe life, we create the our domestic “the

    systemic structure of civilian life indicator socially”. The said indicator

    system is scored with “the social security”, “traffic security”, and “

    public order”, totally 3 dimensions.

    As of “the social security”, we select 5 indicators of 1) the crime

    occurrence rate 2) the case breaking rate 3) the criminal victim percentage 4)

    the marshal personnel resource (ratio) 5) the expenditure rate of marshal

    agencies.

    As of “the traffic security”, we select 5 indicators of 1) the crime

    occurrence rate 2) the case breaking rate 3) the criminal victim percentage 4)

    traffic regulation disobedience rate 5) the car share road area.

    As of “the public order”, we select 5 indicators of 1) the accident

    occurrence rate 2) the disaster victim percentage 3) the public order

    inspection (the eligible rate) 4) the personnel resource of fire fighting 5)

    the facilities of fire fighting (percentage).

    There are totally 15 indicators collected from the annual report of “

    social indicator statistics” issued by the Auditing Department of Executive

    Yuan, the “Fire Fighting Statistic Annual Report’, and the final accounting

    of budge allocation for the “Statistic Brief”.

    This article is separately adopted with Morris Standardized Indicator

    Conversion, and T-score Standardized Indicator Conversion by using SPSS 10.0

    statistic package soft ware to measure and also sequence the life safety

    degrees of various counties and cities. Through 2 experimental operations, we

    find the measured results are quite similar to the indicator sequence. The

    selected indicators from this system are available to effectively and

    concretely evaluate the life safety degree.

    This research also perform the mutual examinations between the established

    objective index of indicator system and the subjective index of the “2002 The

    Satisfaction Degree of Administrative Performance and Public Order for the

    Magistrates from Various Cities and Counties” .The P-value also reaches the

    remarkable degrees to show that the “Safety Indicator System of Social Life

    Safety” can remarkably measure the degrees of marshal security and life

    safety with high confidence and reliability.

    This research is also further aimed to research the hypothesized

    examinations onto the relevant social and economical factors by means of the

    double regression analysis. It comes in no remarkable correlations among the “

    expenditure per household”, “deposit amount”, “controllable income” and “

    unemployment rate”.