實踐層面，研究發現「退紅者」對性暴力的積極倡議，始於女權身份認同的承諾，並藉由「地理潤（Run）出」，試圖突破國家的「去標記」並維繫身份能見度與記憶政治；「脫粉者」則透過「數位潤出」維持性/別參與。理論層面，本研究進一步延伸Brekhus的標記理論，提出「去標記（De-Marking）」、「抗拒標記（Anti-Markedness）」兩種概念，以揭面父權制—威權政體共構下：「標記—去標記—抵抗（掙扎）」的動態機制。此一分析，解釋了中國女權主義者暨 LGBTQ+ 的跨國遷徙脈絡，乃植基於性/別身份認同的迫切性，並以此作基礎去重塑國族歸屬，為跨國女性主義研究、認同研究，提供新的比較視野與理論貢獻。
In their identity practices, Breakaway-Red Feminists actively advocate against sexual violence as a commitment to feminist identity and, through geographic “Run” (leaving China), resist state “De-Marking” while sustaining feminist visibility and memory politics. By contrast, De-Pinked Feminists emphasize personal safety and survival, and through digital “Run,” maintain cautious participation in feminist ＆LGBTQ+ communities. Theoretically, this study extends Brekhus’s Marked/Unmarked theory by introducing “De-Marking” and “Anti-Markedness” to explain the dynamics of‘marked—de-marking—anti-markedness ’ under patriarchal–authoritarian regimes. This study shows that Chinese feminist (LGBTQ+) transnational migration is driven by urgent sex-and gender-based identities, reshaping national belonging and expanding perspectives in transnational feminism and identity studies.
